Section 324/353/148/149 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (b), 9 (b) and 25 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Ordinance) (VI of 1979), Section 22 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 evidence was defined as the recovery of weapons and ammunition from the possession of the accused, which was regularly observed by the minor witness of the recovery, who completed the prosecution case. Was supported, all the prosecution witnesses were subjected to trial. A lengthy investigation by the defense, but there was no favorable result for the defendants from their mouths, the defense failed to disperse the prosecution's case, with the prosecution's witnesses agreeing on all material points to the medical officer Had examined the suspect who resisted his arrest and was injured during the clash between the police party and the accused, his medical legal report also supported the prosecution case, the two accused. Attempt to loot and plunder passengers on the bus near the persons and accomplices. He had been around the whole spread of terror and panic in the area, were recovered blank during the inspection, which was sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory for analysis and report suspect positive. Failure to produce any documentary evidence regarding the recovered arms and ammunition was reasonably related to the commission of the crime charged with the prosecution, in these cases, any reasonable suspicion case against the suspects. Was heard on the record
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
