30-30/324/34 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 417 (2A). And the presence of witnesses at the time of the incident, which was used in the deliberations, was suspicious, in which case the medical evidence did not even confirm the statements of the four witnesses; The matter was sent to the Franzic Science Laboratory, which was reported to have been fired with the same weapon, which could mean that the attacker was one and two names. The Mystery of the accused who was further suggested that the witness is not known to the accused the benefit of the doubt in this case. The victim was a fugitive, and in his normal life, he had some weapons that should have been recovered from his body or witnesses should have been told that I had been taken away by the assailants, but There was no evidence of bloodshed between the parties, eyewitnesses were interesting witnesses and the unusual delay in filing the report clearly indicated that they were charged after consulting the accused and the accused was absconding. Was killed. In an unseen event, the criminal appeal was not successful, and the right to take advantage of the suspicion was extended to the accused for their misconduct.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
