Sections 12, 42 and 55 of the Suit for Declaration, Permanent Compulsory Order and Contract Specific Performance Case Trial Court approve the decree for the specific performance of the contract contained in the Cabinet, and the value / market value of the plot available in favor of the plaintiff. Ordered to collect the money accordingly. In keeping with the trial court's decision and decree, the court filed a review petition against the following decisions and orders of the following courts, which was executed in the form of an agreement between the parties on the occasion of the marriage, It was agreed that the plaintiff / husband would provide the plaintiff / wife a plot to construct the house, the testimony presented by the plaintiff, who was the author of the pending contract, said that according to work testimony, the witness was too long. Long has been the subject of cross-examination, but there was nothing to the contrary. Squeezed from the mouth of the witness, a variation chart was made to break down the true patwari lighter that appeared as a witness, which showed the average value of the plot in the plaintiff and his father in the plaintiff. The allegations contained were confirmed, all the witnesses were cross examined, but there was no issue in their mouths to disperse the matter. The plaintiff, who appeared as her sole witness, confessed to her signature, saying that the plaintiff named Cabinet had proved her case by presenting cautious and credible evidence, which was passed by the defendants on cross-examination. I cannot disperse: The two courts below recorded solidarity searches of facts which cannot be discounted. Respondent Les
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
