In section 2302 (b), the definition of evidence that died in his declaration of death was effectively charged with firing. Nothing is available on the record to indicate that the deceased's statement was externally indicated. And as a daylight incident, the identity of the accused cannot be doubted. The death of the deceased was recorded after fulfilling the precedent and free from any doubt, he said. The witness's testimony of the defendant, who was the witness of the prosecutor, and of the witness, was free of doubt, in support of the true statement of the deceased's statement (then injured). In the immediately-filed report, the credible testimony of such witness, whose name was also mentioned in the Meadow Legal report, was put to a lengthy investigation by the defense. , But nothing could be stopped to stop it. The prosecution's case was the motivating part of the incident that was confessed to the crime, however, the absence or impairment of the motive was not significant enough to prove the crime and was not a necessary factor to suspect in the prosecution's case. , Defense witness was not deployed. Reliable and trustworthy behavior was a strong evidence of the reason for his crime in the crime as he not only escaped the law after the crime was committed, but he was also discharged from court custody. He was the accused. Where the alternative was a rare case, the prosecutor successfully managed to prove his case against the accused, and the trial court correctly brought one of the evidence to the record
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
