Section 497 Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 411 Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Section 17 (3) guarantees, except for certain currency notes, neither the pistol nor the complainant. Any other articles. There was also a begging question from the accused to recover the currency notes and his co-accused had no previous history of robbery or robbery, along with fellow accused, the accused remained in police custody. They were widely investigated and subjected to police tactics, but they did not admit. And despite such a prolonged stay with the police, they were never put into an identity parade that required the challan to appear in the trial court on 17 12 2008, but no prosecution witnesses could be examined. And no good reason was revealed. Although the police witness and the complainant were all located a few kilometers from the premises where the trial was being held, the key factors that led to the delay in the settlement of the bail application were the suppressed party's conduct. The trial was held to prevent the grant of bail, and even to deliberately avoid the judicial process, not to seek a lawyer to prevent the case from being heard and to prevent the trial court from testifying. I am well-attended to prevent unnecessary delays. Certainly, the lower court was brought into the lower court to halt the process of investigation or trial and the investigation by the police into the court, headed by the Chief Justice of Pakistan.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
