MAJOR GENERAL (RETD.) FAZLE GHAFOOR versus TOTAL PARCO PAKISTAN LTD.
Sections 2 (c), 17, 31, 34 and 39 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), VIII, R10 Arbitration Agreement Trial jurisdiction over withdrawal of territories Resigned jurisdiction , Under which he returned it. The relevant paragraph of the Arbitration Settlement Agreement will show that it specified only the provision of the Arbitration, its place and the Arbitration Act, 1940, despite the fact that there would be a place of arbitration. place P Section 2 (c) of the Arbitration Act, 1940, did not come into the civil court at any place. What was needed and what was pressed was that the court should be a civil court and it should not be arbitrated. It must have jurisdiction to prosecute due to a dispute in respect of which the civil court will not have jurisdiction under any interpretation of the place where the matter was subject to dispute and its territorial jurisdiction. The reason for the action was that I was born, Section 31 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, also, will not come in the way of the civil court, when all the questions listed therein are decided by the same court. Can be yah. Defendants may well move the application for a stay of proceedings under section 34 of the Arbitration Act 1940 if they feel that the appellant has not done anything good by jumping on the arbitration clause and there is hardly a chance that It should demand the return of the claimant. The case allows an appeal, the unanticipated order was put aside and the case was remanded to the trial court for a lawful decision.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
