Sections 201 and 2 302 Definition of evidence The benefit of the doubt, the punishment, the lack of identification of the room in the accused's house where he killed the victim was irrelevant because there was nothing from the place where human blood, etc. Was recovered, allegedly faded and the ax was recovered. The accused were recovered on identification of the accused, they were not subjective articles, as they were not stained with human blood as the articles are generally available in the houses of each village, their nexus with the crime is not beyond doubt. It was reported that no credible evidence was found on the record. Prove that the accused was the person who committed the murder of the perpetrator and to that extent he deserved the benefit of the doubt, however, there were some strong pieces of evidence available which, under Section 2, PPC. Made a series of sentences for the accused: the statement of his real sister that the deceased had left home to go to his parents' home which was uncontrollable and the incident occurred; second, the accused had filed Section 2342, CRP. In his statement under C, he admitted that he knew that Mutofi had been killed by his enemies. The third was the recovery of a blood-stained dagger in its place, which was buried by the side of the water channel and hidden. And no one else knew this before reaching the memo regarding the recovery of the place, which was proven by the memo prosecution witness's statement. Fourth and finally, the blood on the dagger resembled the blood of the deceased on the ground where he was buried. Such a situation was anecdotal evidence that proved that the accused knew at least that the deceased had killed his enemies. And then he killed his killer
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
