Testimonies of Section 9 (c) Evidence The witnesses gave straightforward and inspirational evidence in their positions, and despite lengthy cross-examination, the defense failed to degrade its credibility, with the defendant facing illicit heroin. Was arrested. Every 12 packets of the sample, he was found heroin in the chemical inspector's report and according to another report, brown and dark brown powder was also found heroin, contradicting the statements of the prosecution witnesses, because it remained Was. The private prosecution witnesses observed that narcotics smugglers always waited for fear of retaliation. Otherwise, no contradiction was found in the prosecution case on the material points of time and recovery, by bus with 12kg of heroin. The accused's arrest accused the ANF officials of no illicit desire or resentment for their false interference. The trial court was not open to any exception, nor did heroin by prosecution. Such a large quantity can be charged neither the contradiction of material against the accused nor the contradiction of the record. This was in order to destroy the credibility of prosecution evidence. The prosecution's witnesses had fully supported and corroborated the case with impressive evidence of conviction and the defendant had failed to substantiate his defense request by presenting evidence in support of it, in a reasonable decision at trial. No interference was guaranteed \ r \ n
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
