Section 302 (b) Appraising evidence There was no bloodshed or any kind of enmity between the parties and the site of the incident which was alleged by the complainant and was shown on the site line Medical evidence. It was proved that the victim was killed by the use of fireworks The complainant not only belonged to the accused, but also from other sources would be required to testify to his statement, on this basis and so on. On the basis that he was his only witness. The complainant's statement that the three accused had father and two sons, did not appeal to the mind merely because of a dispute over the sale of a quail to kill the victim, medical evidence contradicts the complainant's oral testimony. Had suffered This mood and mood were not affected as eyewitnesses accused of delaying the registration report by at least 1/2 hour, suspected it, complaining about the presence of the complainant on the spot and indicating the accused Prior to consultation and negotiation there was no exaggeration of any of the accused, but the accused's father and brother were also included. He was also unaware and raised suspicion throughout the prosecution's case. The ocular testimony of a solitary eye witness, who was an opportunity witness, could not be relied upon to convict him on capital charges. Because he was lied to by medical evidence. Because of the alleged physical abuse of the accused, as well as the inconsistent version of the prosecution and the impairment of the motivation, the accused was accused of being 2/2 months behind bars.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
