RIZWAN ULLAH versus SECRETARY HOME AND TRIBAL AFFAIRS GOVT. OF N.-W.F.P. PESHAWAR
Section Section Constitution Constitution Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application Cautiously detained applicants questioned their order of detention, stating that they had never been involved in any activity. It is prejudicial to public safety or restoration of district discipline. It was brought to record that the applicants were ever involved in any activity, which could be a prelude to public safety and the restoration of public order on district-related charges that the applicants were involved in a good number of cases in Swat. There was nothing irrational about the destruction of peace in the area, as it was considered because of the extremists coming to their homes, but who witnesses the visits and they want peace for the area. How destructive things will work. The allegation is also unconfirmed that the applicants were the sons of Sophie Mohammed, who caused the dispute. The uprising in Swat, but only they did not justify their prevention in line with Section 21 of the Frontier Crimes Regulation, 1901, which was not applicable in the area when no credible material was brought in (on record). To show that the applicants were acting in a prejudicial way to public safety and that the applicants were ordered to be released for restoration of public order.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
