Sections 42 and 54 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), section 115 suit declaration and permanent injunction were two competing suits for the same rival case, pending trial when the trial court dismissed a trial which As a result, other defendants were dismissed. In the second case, an appeal was filed before the appellate court against the judgment and order passed by the trial court and the appellate court, and the decision and order passed by the trial court were set aside by the other trial and claimant claimants. An order was passed in favor of which the decision was pronounced. The trial court had challenged that the respondents had been prepared in the Appellate Court's decision and the important appeal in the decree, but they were not made a party to the amendment. And the appellate court passed an unenforceable decree against the respondents and against the excluded respondents, it was a joint decree and did not apply to the respondents who were parties before the appellate court, disqualifying the decision. Was given where this decision was irrevocable and some parties were excluded, then the appeal or revision was ineligible because the current revision request was ineligible and had to be rejected in this category and the decision of the appellate court was absolutely Was correct, just and any evidence of misunderstanding or non-reading according to the principles established by the definition of evidence No way. The revision petition referred to the counsel of the solicitor to guarantee interference by the High Court.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
