Find a Lawyer

WAHIDULLAH versus YOUSAF JAMAL

Section 497 (5) Crimes against Property (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance (VI 1979), Section 14 bail cancellation, petition for respondent / accused was not imposed in FIR, but later under section 160 , Was charged in the statement under CRPC. Article was recovered from the possession of the accused merit The accused was rightfully granted bail, especially when his two accomplices against whom the bail plea was canceled, the High Court rejected the motion. And even the principle of consistency is needed. The request for cancellation of the accused's bail could not be granted;

Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009

• SHER ZADA v. THE STATE through Izzat Khan 2009 PCrLJ 1445
• SAIR AJAB KHAN v. ZAR WALI SHAH 2009 MLD 1448
• ABDUR RAZAQ v. RAB NAWAZ 2009 PCrLJ 1456
• KAMAL SHAH v. Mst. ZOBIADA BEGUM 2009 MLD 1470
• RIZWAN ULLAH v. SECRETARY HOME AND TRIBAL AFFAIRS GOVT. OF N.-W.F.P. PESHAWAR 2009 MLD 1482
• MUHAMMAD NAEEM v. State 2009 MLD 1490
• SARDAR KHAN v. SHAH NAWAZ 2009 YLR 1516
• MUHAMMAD NAWAZ v. SAIFUR REHMAN 2009 YLR 1538

All Peshawar High Court NWFP judgments of 2009 →

advocate for immigration from Jhudo lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes