The Section 12 suit for the specific performance of the sale agreement for sale excluded defendants from the lawsuit filed, but their appeal was partially allowed to the extent of the refund of the deal previously paid to the defendants, And the lower orders were based on non-reading of false documents and material evidence on record, and thus it was not a sustainable court on the one hand because the contract acknowledged the oral sale of the land, while on the other hand it had The defendant / seller had the right to transfer the suit land to another person through a registered sale dead record. The case was dismissed in the case, which clearly showed that the defendants had struck a sale agreement in favor of the plaintiffs in respect of the suit land. The lighter of the money also signed the defendant's signature in the Daily Waketti on the same date. It was also stated that the vendor's registration of the changes in favor of the plaintiffs, who were officially recognized on the oath, also confirmed that the unclean verdict and the lower order were set aside and that Les was adjudicated. Was remanded to the trial court for.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
