Definitions of Articles 9 (c), 32, 33 and 48 of the vehicle used by the owner of the vehicle allegedly in the confiscation of the vehicle were rejected by the trial court's order in appeal. Prior to the issuance of the notice was considered as the appellant / owner under the provisions of section of33, the provisions of the Drug Substances Control Act 1997 were enforced in subsection (2) only when it was proved That the vehicle was allowed to seize. That the owner knew that the crime was being committed and that the owner of the vehicle had to issue a notice and after hearing it, the law had to determine the point as no such notice was administered by narcotic substances. Is. The Act, 1997, when the vehicle was given to the appellant / owner, could only be struck on the same ground as the confiscation order. The trial court was set aside to the extent of confiscating the vehicle under trial, and the trial was remanded to the trial court in order to strictly instruct the court to proceed.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
