STATE THROUGH ADVOCATE-GENERAL, N. -W. F. P., PESHAWAR versus SHUAIB AYUB TANOLI
Section 302/324 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 417 Appeal to the police against a case that was settled after an hour's delay without any explanation, the trial court correctly observed that there was an hour delay. Subsequent filing of a report is one such case which does not exclude the possibility of the accused being lied to as a result of the consultation. I was delayed by an hour to get a negative glimpse of him, in the circumstances the importance of his presence was understood by all. Initial investigations were made before and then a complaint was filed when the complainant approached the Investigation Officer when the prosecution declared the matter suspicious or when the police recorded the statement of another witness and even completed the investigation. After or at any point during the investigation, Iwitt said that Ness did not name the suspect until his evidence was recorded at trial, which can only be considered an unwise improvement. ? The identity of the suspect remained suspicious The reason for the incident was denied by the accused, which was not satisfactorily explained, there is no weakness, legal or otherwise. Found in the unpleasant verdict of victory passed by the trial court, which could justify the intervention.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2009
