Sections 45 (2), 46, 48 (3) and 49 (4) (E) of Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII 1968), Section O13 Returns Complaint Request Request to Reject Complaint Request Request for Secondary Respondents / Employees removed under the Retirement Scheme filed with Section 49 (4) (e) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002 and referred to the National Industrial Relations Commission, which was rejected with observation. It was as if respondents / employees could seek treatment available under the law. ; Employees then filed a complaint under section 46 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance and returned to the Labor Court seven months later; the Appellant / Employers filed a petition under section 45 (2) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 2002. Therefore, to reject the employee complaint request. After spending time in pursuit of the matter before the National Industrial Relations Commission, it can be said that the commission is somewhat parallel to the treatment presented by the Labor Court. And it was very difficult for the workers to draw a line of discrimination before any of the two forums had, in the present case, been detained by the National Industrial Relations Commission and temporarily ordered by the Commission. The contention was to show that the case of unfair labor was brought to the notice by the applicants / employers, which, after deliberations, the Commission sought by the employees to refer to the National Industrial Relations Commission available under the law. Rejected with observation, could not be said. For any other reason, but the appellant's employer acted unfairly
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2009
