SHAFI MUHAMMAD MUGHAL versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
The respondents of Article 9 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Promotion Suppression Development, were promoted from BS 17 to BS 18 through notification, but the applicant was mentioned in the notification regarding removal. Has been excluded because of this, nor was the copy filed by the Defendants minutes with supplementary comments from the Defendants, which can be ascertained. The applicant was dismissed The respondents, in their partial remarks, were enraged that the applicant had to consider their service record. The decrease was denied. Due to its previous conviction, integrity, credibility and Army Vigilance report, prior conviction or Army Vigilance report, applicant is entitled to consideration according to the ST Code after earning PIR in 2000. Promotion and such punishment or reports are not legally considered, especially since the applicant subsequently earned PIR good and very good during 2004, 2005 and 2006, so no other material records. On which the integrity or credibility of the applicant could be decided. The Public Promotion Committee had stopped the development of the applicant, without restraining the evidence, the illegal operation of the applicant was illegal and without legal authority the government respondents were instructed to comply with the relevant rules and regulations. Consider the case of an applicant for development.
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2009
