The testimony of the prosecution testimony of Section 4 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 6 (1) (c), (n), (2) and 7 (h) of the evidence stated that it was the accused at the blast site. Was found running away. In the case of the incident, which was apprehended by other police officers, the other prosecutor's witness did not support the case, saying that the witness was accused of causing the explosion without any further evidence on the record attached to the crime commission. Could not be ruled out, simply because he was seen to have been convicted, it could only be based on solid evidence which, beyond any doubt, involved those involved in the commission of the crime, because it was natural. That people should leave quickly where the explosion was suspected that no legal evidence could be obtained. Is. Punishment can only stand on suspicion under the circumstances Prosecution failed to prove charge against the accused
Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2009
