Find a Lawyer

FAZAL QADIR QALBANI versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

Under Section 171 and Section 171 of the 187 Customs Act, 1969, the owner of the vehicle was charged with non-service of notice and such charge was in the knowledge of the owner, so there was no prejudice to him. ? The non-service owner of such notice did not make such a request to the Adjudication Officer nor demand a copy of the confiscated memo in which such charge was made, the Customs Act, 1969 Section 171 was not complied with, was not fatal under the circumstances.

Related judgments — Quetta High Court Balochistan, 2009

• ABDUL KHALIQ v. State 2009 PLD 33
• SHAH FAISAL v. State 2009 PLD 40
• PRISM PRINTERS (PVT.) LTD. v. MANAGING DIRECTOR, LASBELLA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 2009 CLC 190
• Haji ABDUL RASOOL MENGAL v. CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER 2009 CLC 196
• SHAFI MUHAMMAD MUGHAL v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Establishment Division, Islamabad 2009 PLC(CS) 355
• HABIB BANK LIMITED v. MUHAMMAD ASLAM KAKAR 2009 PLC 361
• AMIR HAMZA v. State 2009 YLR 621
• Dr. HAFIZ MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE v. GOVERNMENT OF BALOCHISTAN through Chief Secretary, Quetta 2009 PLC(CS) 656

All Quetta High Court Balochistan judgments of 2009 →

family advocate from Pasroor lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes