NUSRAT ULLAH KHAN NIAZI versus REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE
The disclosure of the League's Remarks on Section 5 Advertising Remarks, Appellant's Principle, while the appointment of a Judicial Officer, allowed the application under Section 249A, CCPC for the defendant's conduct. The complainant filed an appeal in the High Court after dissatisfaction in which the appellant was summoned and the appellant resigned to resign under protest, and earlier on 15 3 1999 to return his resignation. Request submitted to. The representation against the notification of resignation, which was dismissed, the appellant was informed of the appellant after his resignation, the appellants submitted representation for dismissal of the negative remarks which were dismissed, The appellant filed an appeal against the negative remarks and the notification of acceptance was approved. His resignation, which was rejected, so the appellant referred to the Supreme Court, which set aside the notification of approval of the appellant's resignation and directed that the appellant's service be appealed to the appellant's Punjab Judicial Service Trial. Be considered pending. Banal, who will be dealt with well, said the appellant's words were that he had a relentless 14-year career before making negative comments. Reporting officers have evaluated his performance as a good, honest officer in his turn in the relevant columns of section six. That the countersigning officer was affected by the appellant's resignation and no warning or advice was provided to the appellant by the reporting officer or the counseling officer regarding their integrity. Counseling officers
Related judgments — Punjab Subordinate Judicial Service Tribunal, 2014
