After his retirement, Selection Grade 5 grant of BS 21 was retired as District and Sessions Judge (BS20) on 16, 2004, which was reported on 3, 2004, along with the appellant's junior colleagues. Twenty-one district and session judges were given a selection grade. The applicant in BS21, ignoring the applicant, was told that he was denied selection grade in BS21, which is why the authorities were selected in the court because of a serious abortion of justice. Appellant was disregarded for approval. In view of its unsatisfactory record in BS 21 and the aforesaid benefit cannot be granted to the appellant as an entitlement because the appellant was retired from service of the Validatee Appellant 16 3 2004 compensation age. Retired from when the notification was issued on 3 7 2004 under which his juniors were given selection grade from BS 21 to 9 12 2000. Apart from the same notification, eight other already retired District and Sessions Judges were also awarded selection grade in BS21, so the objection to retaining the appellant was by any force, the notification to the appellant through selection grade B. S21 was neglected for promotion. Applicant's junior, four officers were given selection grade in BS21 without giving any reason to ignore the applicant for selection grade grant in BS21, in the case of selection grade, the basis of selection merit Had to be on And the authority had no other standard in this regard except through the fair and transparent discretion of Merit.
Related judgments — Punjab Subordinate Judicial Service Tribunal, 2014
