Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SALEEM HUSSAIN versus REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE

The Judicial Officer submitted a representation, which was dismissed by the Reporting Officer on account of Section 5 involuntary remarks, which was dismissed; the Judicial Officer filed a complaint against the Reporting Officer for recording No charges of military or personal casualties have been made. The Judicial Officer's comment was that the negative remarks were recorded without any concrete material or complaint on the basis of which the negative remarks were recorded, justification was not required in writing any concrete material for presenting such remarks. Or a complaint exists. The fiduciary remarks of an officer were reported by the officer, who had the authority to monitor his work and to observe it closely, the remarks recorded by the reporting officer / countersigning officer were generally credible. Based on information and personal observations. Appeal rejected by a reporting officer not recorded on financial basis or scope

Related judgments — Punjab Subordinate Judicial Service Tribunal, 2014

• NUSRAT ULLAH KHAN NIAZI v. REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE 2014 PLC(CS) 1026
• SHAFIQ ABBAS SHAH v. REGISTRAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT LAHORE 2014 PLC(CS) 1167
• MUHAMMAD ASAD ULLAH SIDDIQUI v. REGISTAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE 2014 PLC(CS) 1194
• Malik ZULFIQAR ALI v. LAHORE HIGH COURT 2014 PLC(CS) 1229
• FAQIR-UR-REHMAN JADOON v. CHIEF JUSTICE/AUTHORITY, through Registrar , Peshawar High Court 2014 PLC(CS) 1344

All Punjab Subordinate Judicial Service Tribunal judgments of 2014 →

criminal advocate from Narowal lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes