MUHAMMAD ASAD ULLAH SIDDIQUI versus REGISTAR, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE
Section 10 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 10A Punjab Subordinate Judiciary Service Tribunal Act (XII of 1991), Termination of Section 5 Service The serious allegation of mismanagement authority was dismissed with regular inquiry, due process of right and fair trial appellant. The services were terminated without inquiry. During the interrogation period, he filed a false and provocative complaint to his associate authority by ordering his associate authority to initiate disciplinary proceedings against the appellant inquiry officer, instead of regular inquiry into the termination of appellant's services under section 10. By committing gross misconduct. The authority of the Punjab Civil Servants Act, 1974, proceeded with the procedure of regular inquiry and during the trial period, the order for removal of the appellant was approved. The order of the valetti was not an order to abolish simplicity but was based on allegations of corruption. In fact, the cancellation order was an O. A regular inquiry into the increase in the guilt of removal from the job is necessary, and the appellant is entitled to a fair hearing by the authority. Opportunity should be provided. Serious charges of defamation are pending against the appellant so the appellant cannot be dismissed even during the trial period. By giving the appellant an opportunity to be heard by the due process of law without finding the facts of the allegation, it is ordered that the fundamental right of due process and fair trial is the fundamental right of every person in the country who is in accordance with Article 10A of the Constitution. Is legally protected and guaranteed, which cannot be denied in any case, without any public servant performing the duty and
Related judgments — Punjab Subordinate Judicial Service Tribunal, 2014
