FAQIR-UR-REHMAN JADOON versus CHIEF JUSTICE/AUTHORITY, THROUGH REGISTRAR , PESHAWAR HIGH COURT
Section 5 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Official (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1973, R4 (1) (b) (ii) of Judicial Officer in recording negative remarks in ACR Impact Certificates issued by bar associations. The delay of the mandatory retirement sentence and the legal status of their members was the effect of the appellant's failure to provide the available material against the appellant, that the Chief Justice who recorded the ACR acted as Chief Justice during that period. Was not doing when he recorded negative remarks against the legitimate chief justice in the ACR. During the said period, the appellant's ACR was not functioning as Chief Justice, but if the ACR was not recorded by the former Chief Justice, then the successor Chief Justice would not be required to record such remarks. They were neither denied nor disabled, and the delay in recording negative remarks had no effect. Utilities or legality officers such as the District Judge and the Chief Justice were the only officers who could be properly judged by the work and conduct of the Subordinate Judge who served them. He was the best judge of the work, conduct and character of the appellant, relying on his own observations for his opinion, common reputation and other such material which could be brought to his notice. As part of the material. The senior officers had formed a record opinion on the basis of collecting the events, not even taking notice of them individually and could be recorded separately, however, the full presentation of such events before these persons. The Judicial Officer is permanently retained. Through their decisions
Related judgments — Punjab Subordinate Judicial Service Tribunal, 2014
