Sections 2 (DD) (i), 37 (E) and 52 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 34 Criminal Procedure (V of 1898), Section 403 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 13 Field General Court Martial-Civil Rebellion Scope Theft Crimes Law Enforcement Separate Trial Applying Dual-Risk Applicability Rule Applying Risk Civil Contractors and Air Force Officials Separate Air Force Officers Involved in Jet Petroleum Theft Trials that were found guilty of theft while civilian contractors were put in the Field General Court. The offense committed by the Marshal accused for committing a revolt and attempt to swear allegiance to the Air Force officers was simple, as defined under Section 52 of the Pak Air Force Act 1953. Was, under which ordinary citizens have banished ordinary citizens from ordinary citizens. The Field General Court could not be prosecuted by a Marshall crime, which was proved by the Field General Court Marshal who had exhausted his victorious officers for the crime. Therefore, there could be no jurisdiction and rule of law without the trial of civilians by the Field General Court Marshal, where section 37 (e) of section 2 (DD) (i) of the Pakistan Air Force Act 1953 ). The Act was drawn remotely to bring civil suspects under their jurisdiction as citizens were subject to the usual law of the accused and were recognized by the Pakistan Air Force Act 1953 except when They were guilty of the commission or tried to commit a crime. Rebellion or rebellion from the country was evident by law
