Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAFI versus STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION

Section 15 involves the tenant as a partner and explicitly asserts that he has ceased to be a tenant and that the tenancy rights include all three partnerships. Were transferred but the homeowner's check was accepted by this partnership firm. Do not make a stoppel because by law the transfer of such rights can be exercised only with the prior consent of the landlord - the law cannot be ignored before the law and the house cannot be ignored. It can no longer be verified by the owner. Prevent it from exercising the rights granted by law The Supreme Court dismissed the tenant's appeal, however, due to the premises being a commercial cover, the tenant was granted six months in the same vacancy. \ R \ n

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• GHULAM ABBAS NIAZI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2009 PLD 866
• SINDH HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION through its Secretary v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice, Islamabad 2009 PLD 879
• MUHAMMAD UMAR KHAN v. HABIB BANK LTD. 2009 SCMR 886
• MUHAMMAD UMAR alias UMRI v. State 2009 SCMR 891
• IQBAL AHMED v. MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. 2009 SCMR 903
• GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Establishment Division,Islamabad v. IQBAL AHSAN ZAIDI 2009 SCMR 908
• IFEANYI SAMSON v. State 2009 SCMR 909
• USMAN NASIR DAR v. State 2009 SCMR 911

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

lawer from fb area from Deh Pathaan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes