Find a Lawyer

MAHMOOD HUSSAIN LARIK versus MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED

Article 185 (2) (d) (E) and ()) Appeal to Supreme Court retention Appeals involving labor disputes, service matters, rent jurisdiction or family disputes have no value. Can be The central prayer service involved rehabilitation, dismissal of the tenant on various grounds or the marriage / custody of minors, respectively, although it may be possible for either party to have some financial benefit before the central prayer is approved or denied. In the first instance the court and the appeal cannot be filed directly in any case as the first precondition cannot be verified if the appeal was included in this case under Article 185 (2). Will be. (D) and (e) of the Constitution and if this was not so covered, then leave was sought for appeal to the Supreme Court under Article 185 (3) of the Constitution's rules.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• Mian MUHAMMD AMAR YOUSAF v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Housing and Works, Islamabad 2009 SCMR 843
• QAISER JAVED MALIK v. PERVAIZ HAMEED 2009 SCMR 846
• MUBARAK ALI v. FIRST PRUDENTIAL MODARABA 2009 CLD 849
• Ms. CLARE BENEDICTA CONVILLE v. Mst. SABAHAT IDREES 2009 SCMR 851
• GHULAM ABBAS NIAZI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2009 PLD 866
• SINDH HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION through its Secretary v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice, Islamabad 2009 PLD 879
• MUHAMMAD UMAR KHAN v. HABIB BANK LTD. 2009 SCMR 886
• MUHAMMAD UMAR alias UMRI v. State 2009 SCMR 891

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

power of attorney advocate Hangu lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes