Find a Lawyer

MS. CLARE BENEDICTA CONVILLE versus MST. SABAHAT IDREES

Article 100 and O XLI, R 23 Constitution of Pakistan, (1973), Art 185 (2) Second Appeal Court Exceptions to the written arguments presented by the prosecution in the trial court's decision for re-hearing of the High Court case. Although he discussed and applied his mind to all matters, the appellate court would usually decide the case on merit while sitting on the appeal, but he had no right decision. The evidence on record was sufficient to decide the case; no proper verdict regarding the trial was available on record, therefore, the matter was not barred from remanding the High Court and the plaintiff was acquitted on suit. There will be no remand order for the seizure and the High Court has given time. In the circumstances, the trial court dismissed the appeal to the trial court for re-ruling

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• PARKS PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. through Managing Director v. PRIVATIZATION COMMISSIONER, through Secretary 2009 SCMR 838
• Mian MUHAMMD AMAR YOUSAF v. GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Housing and Works, Islamabad 2009 SCMR 843
• QAISER JAVED MALIK v. PERVAIZ HAMEED 2009 SCMR 846
• MUBARAK ALI v. FIRST PRUDENTIAL MODARABA 2009 CLD 849
• MAHMOOD HUSSAIN LARIK v. MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED 2009 SCMR 857
• GHULAM ABBAS NIAZI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2009 PLD 866
• SINDH HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION through its Secretary v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice, Islamabad 2009 PLD 879
• MUHAMMAD UMAR KHAN v. HABIB BANK LTD. 2009 SCMR 886

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

best advocate from Skardu lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes