MUHAMMAD HALEEM versus GENERAL MANAGER (OPERATION) PAKISTAN RAILWAYS HEADQUARTER, LAHORE
Sections 3, 5 (4) and 10 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) exempted from employment of Pakistan Railway by the authority after charging the illegal supply of water and electricity belonging to the railway to the residents of a colony. Failure to consider filing cause notices on appellant's response without regular inquiry Instead of filing a department appeal, filing legal notices by appellant through his lawyer through the Appellate Tribunal through the service tribunal. Such allegations could only be substantiated by the dismissal of appeals. The evidence presented to prove the appellant responsible for the allegedly unlawful act did not give any reason why it was not necessary to inquire and how the allegations of such facts were justified without the inquiry. Conduct of inquiry was necessary for such evidence as the preliminary order or act relating to the commencement of the proceeding, when the allegations of fact and the same could not be dispensed with were editions defamatory, so all subsequent proceedings and any basis for its implementation. Will not be terminated and the Department will impose penalties on the Appellant without complying with the provisions of the law. However, such legal notices cannot be equated as an appeal under removal from the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance. , 2000 Tribunal engages in technical capacities and completely ignores such illegal acts done by the department, except for lack of legal sanctions due to the imposition of sanctions, it was initiated against the appellant. Action Supreme Court sets aside defamation order
