Find a Lawyer

HABIB-UL-HAQUE ALIAS AJAR versus UMER GUL

Article 188 Review of the decision of the Supreme Court The Supreme Court, having regard to every aspect of the case and after taking a conscious and deliberate decision on the facts and points of law, did not dismiss the petitioner's civil petition nor any mistake or omission. Was presented before the record and no new and important case or evidence was discovered, which is inconsistent with the Supreme Court's applicant's jurisdiction to review, review umbrella. This case cannot be allowed to be reopened and its lawyer cannot be allowed to reopen it. This matter has been denied review \ r \ n

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• NOOR MUHAMMAD v. State 2009 SCMR 324
• MUHAMMAD AZAM v. MUHAMMAD ABDULLAH 2009 SCMR 326
• CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF PAKISTAN v. Miss NASREEN PERVEZ 2009 SCMR 329
• RASOOL BUX v. State 2009 SCMR 333
• MUHAMMAD HALEEM v. GENERAL MANAGER (OPERATION) PAKISTAN RAILWAYS HEADQUARTER, LAHORE 2009 SCMR 339
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX v. FATIMA SHARIF TEXTILE, KASUR 2009 SCMR 344
• MUHAMMAD MURAD v. State 2009 SCMR 348
• JAVED PAREKH v. MUHAMMAD SAFDAR MALIK 2009 SCMR 350

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

inheritance advocates near Daharki lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes