CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF PAKISTAN versus MISS NASREEN PERVEZ
Sections 35 (4) and 10 Service Tribunals Act (LXXI of 1973), Section 3 Civil Servants Act (LXXI of 1973), Section 2 (b) Election Commission of Pakistan Rules, 1989 (Section R128 (I) / 89, Dated) 5 2 1989), 5, 10 and 12 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Ars 199 and 221 Constitutional petition in front of the High Court employees accused of misconduct for compulsory retirement from the Election Commission of Pakistan, finding the answer to the applicants After making such a fine, regularly demand satisfactory notice without inquiry. Before making such a fine, determine the factual basis of such allegations. S regular course of the inquiry was, which was to prove the law, the charges would need clear evidence, could not hold the inquiry. Was working with the Election Commission in relation to the affairs of the Chief Election Commissioner of the Federation in exercising powers under Article 212 of the Constitution, and with the approval of it he commissioned the President in accordance with Section R128 (I) / 89. I laid down rules regarding the terms and conditions of employment, dated 5 2 1989 the applicant would be considered a public servant as their terms and conditions were determined by the federal legislature under Article 212 of the Constitution and run by legal rules. Outbound charges were not constituted of misconduct notice such as removal of service (special powers) Has been called in Dennis, 2000 implemented the order was set aside and the applicant was again restored to working with all the same benefits. General Chat Chat Lounge n
