Find a Lawyer

REHMAN SHAH versus SHER AFZAL

ACLI, Array 23 and 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) scope petitioner obtained the remand after hearing the judgment by the High Court under which the new trial was heard after the trial. Can go However, caution should be exercised in this regard. The court should examine the evidence and if it has been concluded that it is not enough to decide the matter between the parties, then the court should remand the case or record the evidence itself. And failed to decide the case. Identifying not to read any false statements or evidence on record

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• Mst. REHMU v. Mst. AMINA BIBI 2009 SCMR 451
• AHMAD ALI alias ALI AHMAD v. NASAR-UD-DIN 2009 PLD 453
• MUHAMMAD ILYAS v. Mst. AMRAIZAN 2009 SCMR 455
• SHAH HUSSAIN v. State 2009 PLD 460
• Mst. FARIDA KHATOON v. Dr. MASOOD AHMED BUTT 2009 SCMR 464
• QAISAR KHAN v. State 2009 SCMR 471
• Syed MASOOD ALAM RIZVI v. Dr. MUHAMMAD SAEED 2009 SCMR 477
• EJAZ NASEEM v. FAREEHA AHMAD 2009 SCMR 484

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

jobs for advocates from Hub Chowki lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes