Sections 302 (b), 324, 337a (ii), 337f (ii), 337a (ii), 148, 149 and 427 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), for the trial of evidence, immediately Was listed on The ocular testimony presented by the naturalist and the injured witnesses, including the complainant, was consistent on material points, without wasting time, in all likelihood of consultation and consideration by the parties who knew each other prior to the incident. Was fully endorsed, misidentification of the accused was impossible, there were minor contradictions in the evidence. The defendant's conviction, though in itself punishable by conviction, was nonetheless other direct and circumstantial evidence in this case. There was a strong source of co-operation for when the non-release of crime releases was not fatal in the prosecution case. Yep. The occasion was close to the village population and before the investigating officer arrived the passers-by could not be excluded from taking any misunderstandings or evidence, or experiencing no legal or factual weakness, Supreme. Appeal for appeal was rejected after the court sought intervention
