Arts 204 and 185 (3) contempt of court Act (LXIV of 1976), sections 3 and 4 contempt of court The petitioner has asked the applicant to charge the contempt of court for contempt of court. The mind had decided to take action against the applicant under contempt laws and issued notice to it as the High Court had expressed the view that the applicant should be charged in contempt of court proceedings, hence this order, all intents and purposes. For, there was a final order so it was likely that the two orders were attacked in front of the Supreme Court respondents, alleging disobedience and disobedience. Through one High Court and the other by the Supreme Court, two contempt of court petitions were filed, which revealed that the applicants had fulfilled the present service record of the respondent and submitted the matter to the Committee as per the said orders. They could approve it. BS21 was also called upon to consider the defendant's case for regular development in BS21, a meeting of the merit-based committee, which concluded that any professor had regular promotion through regular publicity. BS 21 cannot be promoted nor held in a regular position. BS 21 was present against which any professor could be promoted, the relevant part where the disappeared order petitioners were responding again, by presenting the case to the respondents, the High Court and the Supreme Court. Had followed the instructions and they could not. Arguing that it failed to do so, there was a case against the applicant for initiating contempt proceedings.
