Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ILYAS versus MST. AMRAIZAN

Section 8 West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 42 Recovery of Recovery Recovery Recovery Record of the facts filed by the courts under Modi has claimed that the plaintiff owns the land and alleged it. It has been said that the defendant was a tenant of his own and forcibly occupied the land and there was wrong entry in the record of income and the order passed by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff was upheld by the lower appellate court. And the High Court's correctness the defendant failed to state that the entry of the revenue records How things have changed. Matters found to be anonymous mortgages were clever and were not based on any record, but only certain things that were beyond their jurisdiction because the defendant was a tenant when all the lower courts The fact that the source was recorded did not encounter any false reading or non-reading. Appeals for evidence of interference by the Supreme Court were dismissed

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• GHULAM SHABBIR SHEIKH v. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, QUETTA ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY (QESCO), QUETTA 2009 SCMR 444
• MUHAMMAD NAJEEB v. State 2009 SCMR 448
• Mst. REHMU v. Mst. AMINA BIBI 2009 SCMR 451
• AHMAD ALI alias ALI AHMAD v. NASAR-UD-DIN 2009 PLD 453
• SHAH HUSSAIN v. State 2009 PLD 460
• REHMAN SHAH v. SHER AFZAL 2009 SCMR 462
• Mst. FARIDA KHATOON v. Dr. MASOOD AHMED BUTT 2009 SCMR 464
• QAISAR KHAN v. State 2009 SCMR 471

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

immigration advocates from Adda Shaiwala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes