Find a Lawyer

MST. REHMU versus MST. AMINA BIBI

Section 12 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) failed to provide credible, authoritative and independent evidence to prove the payment of an oral contract for the plaintiff's oral performance suit and he It was ready and ready to be performed. As part of the agreement, after the High Court had legally appreciated the evidence on record and kept every aspect of the case, the plaintiffs of the First Appellate Court had read any wrongdoing, justifying the interference in the record or The evidence was correctly confirmed to indicate not reading. The Supreme Court did not find any legal weakness in the judgment in unclean decisions which resulted in the reversal of the conclusions reached by both appellate courts. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal for leave.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• Mst. SHAUKAT ARA v. Mst. BANU BEGUM 2009 PLD 437
• KHALIDA BIBI v. NADEEM BAIG 2009 PLD 440
• GHULAM SHABBIR SHEIKH v. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, QUETTA ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY (QESCO), QUETTA 2009 SCMR 444
• MUHAMMAD NAJEEB v. State 2009 SCMR 448
• AHMAD ALI alias ALI AHMAD v. NASAR-UD-DIN 2009 PLD 453
• MUHAMMAD ILYAS v. Mst. AMRAIZAN 2009 SCMR 455
• SHAH HUSSAIN v. State 2009 PLD 460
• REHMAN SHAH v. SHER AFZAL 2009 SCMR 462

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

patent advocate from Mangal Sada lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes