Find a Lawyer

REHAM DAD versus SYED MAZHAR HUSSAIN SHAH

Continuation of proceedings against the accused in Sections 91 and 204 Private Complaint The trial court is required to ensure proceedings against the accused by the trial court to ensure that the next hearing is required under section 91, CR PC and To instruct the accused to execute the bond with or without bail. His presence in the court also empowered the court to compel the detainee to detain the person present in section 91, CRPC if he failed to provide security for his attendance [latest theory For 2014 see SCMR 1762]

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2015

• PAKISTAN WAPDA EMPLOYEES PEGHAM UNION v. MEMBER, NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION, ISLAMABAD 2015 PLC 45
• KHALID IQBAL v. MIRZA KHAN 2015 PLD 50
• BANKERS EQUITY (LTD.) v. BENTONITE PAKISTAN LTD. 2015 SCMR 54
• BANKERS EQUITY (LTD.) v. BENTONITE PAKISTAN LTD. 2015 CLD 56
• COMMISSIONER MULTAN DIVISION, MULTAN v. MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN 2015 SCMR 58
• GHULAM QAMMER SHAH v. MUKHTIAR HUSSAIN 2015 PLD 66
• PEOPLE UNITY OF PIA EMPLOYEES CBA, KARACHI v. The REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS (NIRC) ISLAMABAD 2015 PLC 68
• SUBHANUDDIN v. PIR GHULAM 2015 PLD 69

All Supreme Court judgments of 2015 →

list of advocates from Mastoi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes