Find a Lawyer

BANKERS EQUITY (LTD.) versus BENTONITE PAKISTAN LTD.

Recovery suit for non-compliance with Sections 9 (1) and (2) of the Securities 9 (1) and (2) Recovery suit filed by the plaintiff. Was completely rejected. It had failed to comply with Sections 9 (1) and (2) of the Financial Affairs (Financial Recovery) Ordinance, 2001. With the full justice of 2001, the plaintiff admitted that the error / omission by the plaintiff was imminent and if the plaintiff amended the plaintiff. Within a period of 15 days, the defendant rejected the plaintiff's decision and did not object to the apex court's view of the defendant's fair position and directed the plaintiff to file an amendment case within 15 days. Allowed.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2015

• LIBERTY PAPERS LTD v. HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN 2015 PLD 42
• BADSHAH GUL WAZIR v. GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA 2015 SCMR 43
• PAKISTAN WAPDA EMPLOYEES PEGHAM UNION v. MEMBER, NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION, ISLAMABAD 2015 PLC 45
• KHALID IQBAL v. MIRZA KHAN 2015 PLD 50
• BANKERS EQUITY (LTD.) v. BENTONITE PAKISTAN LTD. 2015 CLD 56
• REHAM DAD v. Syed MAZHAR HUSSAIN SHAH 2015 SCMR 56
• COMMISSIONER MULTAN DIVISION, MULTAN v. MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN 2015 SCMR 58
• GHULAM QAMMER SHAH v. MUKHTIAR HUSSAIN 2015 PLD 66

All Supreme Court judgments of 2015 →

family advocate from Gaggo Mandi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes