Find a Lawyer

COMMISSIONER MULTAN DIVISION, MULTAN versus MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN

The evidence leased to the proprietary rights granted to sections 5 (5) and 19 state landowners, Registered Registered Tehsil under the provincial government administered by the Professor Tehsil Register, has revealed that the Commissioner recommended the grant of proprietary rights. Did not The lease on the land on the lease, and the transfer of ownership rights under it, was not approved by the lease. Thus, the heirs of the allottee lacked the right to acquire the property rights of the land leased. Remanded the Case Board of Revenue to modify its order under which Allot was granted its authority. The Supreme Court directed that the Board of Revenue take into account the recommendations made by its judicial member for the alternative land allotment and given to its heirs. For more than 100 years in the development work the land was rented out for him accordingly the appeal was allowed

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2015

• KHALID IQBAL v. MIRZA KHAN 2015 PLD 50
• BANKERS EQUITY (LTD.) v. BENTONITE PAKISTAN LTD. 2015 SCMR 54
• BANKERS EQUITY (LTD.) v. BENTONITE PAKISTAN LTD. 2015 CLD 56
• REHAM DAD v. Syed MAZHAR HUSSAIN SHAH 2015 SCMR 56
• GHULAM QAMMER SHAH v. MUKHTIAR HUSSAIN 2015 PLD 66
• PEOPLE UNITY OF PIA EMPLOYEES CBA, KARACHI v. The REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS (NIRC) ISLAMABAD 2015 PLC 68
• SUBHANUDDIN v. PIR GHULAM 2015 PLD 69
• SUO MOTU CASE NO.24 OF 2010 2015 PLC(CS) 73

All Supreme Court judgments of 2015 →

best law firm from Gharo lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes