Find a Lawyer

KHALID IQBAL versus MIRZA KHAN

Arts 184, 187 and 188 The Supreme Court's authority to modify or relinquish its first decision The Constitution has no restriction or restriction on the Supreme Court for revising or even separating from its previous decisions. Imposed, and the theory of the staggering decision will not be guaranteed to be revised until that time, again on a visit to the Supreme Court in view of the significant impact on the fundamental rights of citizens or the public good. Powers were the absolute power to take and / or set. The constitutional powers of the Supreme Court did not rely on the application of the Article of the Constitution, putting aside its prior decisions / orders under Art 184 (3), 187 or 188. Party

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2015

• MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. State 2015 PLD 41
• LIBERTY PAPERS LTD v. HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN 2015 PLD 42
• BADSHAH GUL WAZIR v. GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA 2015 SCMR 43
• PAKISTAN WAPDA EMPLOYEES PEGHAM UNION v. MEMBER, NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION, ISLAMABAD 2015 PLC 45
• BANKERS EQUITY (LTD.) v. BENTONITE PAKISTAN LTD. 2015 SCMR 54
• BANKERS EQUITY (LTD.) v. BENTONITE PAKISTAN LTD. 2015 CLD 56
• REHAM DAD v. Syed MAZHAR HUSSAIN SHAH 2015 SCMR 56
• COMMISSIONER MULTAN DIVISION, MULTAN v. MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN 2015 SCMR 58

All Supreme Court judgments of 2015 →

pakistani advocates Vehari lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes