Sections 302 (b), 364 and 392 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 Law Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 43 Re-examination of evidence Last seen evidence Extra judicial confession Common trial Both other independent witnesses A defendant's statement against the suspect was seen riding a deceased taxi from a taxi stand with two unidentified men after the victim's body was found on the tip of a suspect who had committed extra-judicial confession. The death sentence was heard by the High Court in the presence of the prosecution witness at the taxi stand where he The last time he saw a dead man he was in cross-examination because he worked for auto-electric and repairing taxis and so on. Since the prosecution's witness was an independent witness who had nothing to do with the complainant or the victim, except that he knew the latter, who gave an impressive statement of truth and confidence in the incident - the defendant's car by two suspects. The two other unidentified men riding in and inspecting their departure from the witness's testimony could not be excluded from the prosecution's testimony except for their refusal to acknowledge the last time the complainant was informed of the evidence. In his statement before, it was a minor contradiction and could be ignored by the prosecution's witness. There was no reason to falsely implicate the two accused because in their cross-examination the accused did not remotely suggest any hostility, the evidence of the two witnesses of the prosecution was faith-based and the accused could be trusted, Which led to additional prosecution
