Find a Lawyer

YAROON KHAN versus LAL ZADA

Section 149 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) petitioner's contention was that he did not intentionally commit the covenant. That the trial court did not direct him to collect the special court fee. That the lower appellate court, along with the trial court, did not give the applicant sufficient time to submit the court fee, that the High Court did not appreciate the issue in its true context while maintaining the concurrent results of the two courts. Done. And if given the opportunity, the applicant was ready to meet the court fee reduction, the appellate approval was granted to consider the applicant's evil.

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2009

• MAHMOOD HASSAN HARVI v. State 2009 SCMR 1109
• ZIA-UR-REHMAN v. DIVISIONAL SUPERITNENDENT, POSTAL SERVICES, ABBOTTABAD 2009 SCMR 1121
• DEWAN CEMENT LTD. v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS AND SALES TAX 2009 SCMR 1126
• MOBASHAR AHMAD v. State 2009 SCMR 1133
• IFTIKHAR AHMED v. State 2009 SCMR 1142
• TEHSIL MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION v. MUHAMMAD AMIR 2009 SCMR 1161
• MUHAMMAD YOUNIS v. ESSA JAN 2009 SCMR 1169
• ZARIN QAISRA v. AHMAD FARAZ 2009 SCMR 1173

All Supreme Court judgments of 2009 →

best law firm from Punch lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes