Plaintiffs 42, 55 and 39 filed suit for cancellation of declarations, permanent injunctions and alterations on the basis that their ancestors purchased the property in question about 1 131 years ago by citation / writing, Thereafter, he and the plaintiff were cultivating without interference in such a way that the procurement document was shown to be executed in the presence of backward witnesses, but none of them had signed the said document and Neither was it confirmed by a competent authority, even the shopkeeper's residence was not disclosed in the same direction as the old manuscript. Yves was not put on record and was not displayed in the evidence document which was not part of the judicial record, his judicial notice could not be taken to the lower courts, ie the trial court. Because the head of the appellate court did not take into consideration the said document / document while prosecuting the defendants because they could not produce enough. Strong evidence for establishing his submissions in the plaintiff and the results was affirmed by the High Court, under which the plaintiff's decision affirmed that the record was entered in favor of someone else in the property Was ancestors. Which has proved that the final conclusions of fact presented by the three courts against the defendants cannot be interfered with by the Supreme Court. The defendants have made an illegal, weak, jurisdictional detection, misrepresentation. Or pointed them out not to read. The apex court dismissed the evidence to interfere with the unanimous decision by the Supreme Court's appeal. \
