Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

IFTIKHAR AHMED versus STATE


Article 2 (b) and Constitution 365 of a Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 in connection with the convictions of the accused appealed to the Supreme Court, the results recorded by the courts below read any misreading / proof or any legal weakness. Did not encounter The warrant was sufficiently available on the record by the Supreme Court, which proved the prosecution's case against the accused and, therefore, he filed his appeal from the listed courts to record the convictions against the accused. On the basis of the evidence available on the record, the Supreme Court also rejected the lawyer's request to interfere with the order passed by the High Court, or to seize his property, however , There was a lawyer's request to punish the perpetrators of the crime. Allowed to be reasonable

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of advocates from Khairpur Nathan Shah lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.