A review of the evidence of Sections 2 302 (b), 4?4 and of 449 under section 2342 of the accused, CRPC, has adequately revealed that it did not deny the commission of the crime. The accused confessed that he was the cause of the murders and injured the women. The accused further stated that he acted under severe and sudden provocation and that the High Court accepted the act of grave and sudden provocation which led to the murder of the accused in self-defense and gave the accused to the victim's murder. The sentence was reduced by amending the sentence to take self-defense against those women who, according to the accused themselves, were not armed with suits nor able to justify direct firing to the accused. They were neither comprehensible nor understandable, causing one woman to lose her life and three others were allegedly injured. Arrived at the victim's house adjacent to his house, and started firing indiscriminately on the woman, resulting in the death of a woman and injured three persons, blood stains were taken from the victim's house. ? Medical evidence, including the post-mortem report, supported the prosecution's case to sustain injuries sustained by the accused, in no way would it constitute a mitigating circumstance in the specific circumstances of this case, to provide lesser punishment. Under the circumstances, it was rightly observed. The accused caused the death of the woman and injured three innocent women without any poetry or reason; the appeal of the accused without merit, while upholding the judgment of the High Court, was dismissed by the Supreme Court.
