CHAUDHRY MUHAMMAD MUNIR versus ELECTION TRIBUNAL, MANDI BAHAUDDIN
R 12 (4) Recent Elections Notorious Disqualification and Implementation of Principles of Voters The Bogus Matriculation Certificate Appellant garnered the most votes in the election and was announced to return the candidate, but the Election Tribunal disqualified him. And the respondents who got the second highest vote were ruled that the High Court approved by the Election Tribunal in the exercise of the constitutional jurisdiction raised by the appellant was that he was not disqualified or defamed. The principle of voting principle did not apply, the accuracy the High Court examined on this question Failure to seek judicial jurisdiction without appearing in the investigation is apparent. The face of the record is that the applicant's disqualification was not infamous and thus the principle of throwing votes was not applicable. The respondents who got the second highest votes were declared as returning candidates on these seats. Were not entitled which were vacated due to the merits of the appellant. But the part of the candidates returning to their proceedings and errors will not force the voters to exercise their right to vote, nor will the court grant proper orders in exercising the powers to give full powers under the Constitution. And issuing instructions. Setting aside the Election Tribunal and the High Court-approved decisions, the Election Commission directed that steps be taken for the fresh selection of office vacancies for union councilors and vice presidents.
