In the Arts 184 (3) and 185 (3) Public Interest Litigation, the petitioner filed a constitutional petition against the respondents against the public interest litigation, and this question led to the park's Nature, which has since been used as a public park. Prior to the split, the change was made and so many people had illegally crossed the ground and built shops with a corrupt staff of the Corporation High Court, dealing with some observations on the issue. The applicant was not satisfied with the decision of the High Court for leave to appeal to the High Court, in the present case, the matter was properly considered and certain directions / observations were made to restore the present status of the park. This request was dealt with and the High Court has taken adequate security measures to address this concern. Were defeated. Unless the relevant authorities are prevented from taking any such matter by the applicant, the administration's lawyers for any other purpose, under the applicant's letter and spiritual complaint to the Supreme Court, direct the High Court's instructions and observations. And other residents of the area were adequately disposed of for that purpose, and the authorities concerned took care of maintaining the status of the park, not presenting an appeal case. Through the application observation, all concerned were advised to keep the promises made before the Supreme and Will be subject to action. The court
