Section 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art 185 (3) Investigating the evidence of appeal against acquittal by the High Court; injury to the accused by the sutta on the victim's head, which witnesses The court ruled that Sota's recovery from the evidence was not supported by the medical, dismissed. Ocular testimony was inconsistent with the contents of the FIR, and at the same time the medical evidence was rightly denied by the High Court for the presence of eyewitnesses at the relevant time. The co-accused was acquitted by the trial court on the basis of the evidence on which the accused was convicted and sentenced to death without accepting this principle, such witnesses must be carefully examined and carefully examined. As such, the improvement by eyewitnesses, who together with medical witnesses became witnesses in their statements, led to serious doubts about their authenticity. The complainant was denied the circumstances to appeal any illegal interference or weakness.
