Sections 4, 32 and 42 of the Competition Commission Appeals Rules, 2007, R20 Interim Relief, Appeal Approval Against Commission Order Appellants for interim relief in their own appeals against an order passed by a member of the Competition Commission in this case. Applications were filed. Under section 32 of the Competitive Commission Ordinance, 2007, the three stock exchanges were allowed to impose floors on the securities prices on the trading of securities in the appellate bench, giving the competing Commission Appeals Rules of 2007 20 was read. In addition, under the R20 (3) of the Competition Commission Appeals Rules, 2007, in the case of urgency and for the purpose of protecting the public interest, the Appellate Bench gives its powers to grant interim relief on all relevant grounds. Was needed, including three important factors; (i) the urgency of the matter. (ii) The effect of praying for relief on the party, if relief is not found. And (iii) the impact on competition, if relief is found in this case immediately, to the extent that in the absence of restraining orders for the collection of fines, competition may be initiated by the Commission. The floor of the share price had already been removed, so the recovery from interim relief would not have any adverse effect, the appellants also gave rise to grounds which the Bench had given due consideration and due consideration. Commitment was needed. It is possible to take time to hold, however, in the circumstances, it was fair and appropriate to give relief to the appellants to the extent that no commission proceedings would be initiated until the final settlement of the appeals. ?
