TRADING CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN (PVT,) LIMITED versus
Sections 3, 4, 28 (2), 30, 31 and 32 lacking irregularities and transparency in the tendering process, the Competition Commission of Pakistan took notice of the news that the Trading Corporation of Pakistan had tendered its sugar imports. By the terms. Failure to provide level playing field and equal opportunities to all original suppliers / partners for the import of 500,000 MT of sugar, thus violating Sections 3 and 4 of the Competition Ordinance 2007 In order to prevent, reduce and prevent competition. Following the inquiry, the Commission appointed the inquiry officer in accordance with the provisions of section 28 (2) of the Ordinance. Complained about Officers in their preliminary investigation report identified some provisions of the tender terms and conditions, possibly because of concerns that according to the tender terms, the first aspect excludes the contestants from the tendering process and It is likely that the import of sugar will be high cost which could have a negative impact on consumers and the public. Large, the Commission issued a Notice of Hearing under Sections 30, 31 and 32 of the Competitive Ordinance 2007, raised by all parties to the terms and conditions of all sexes expressed by the Commission. After hearing the objections, Trading Corporation Pakistan agreed that the tender that opened on 13 2 2010 was merged with the tender schedule of 15 2 2010, according to which, the tender schedule for 15 220 Increase the amount of sugar for
